Global Weirding: the New Big Lie

They're calling it Global Weirding now, as I suppose, inevitably they were bound to do in the end. Well "global warming" stopped working in 1989 when the globe stopped warming. Climate change was always a bit of a non-starter because climate does change regardless of whether or not we all drive 4 x 4s, or buy carbon offsets or listen to Stephen Fry and Ron Weasley's injunction to take our holidays in England this year. And Global Climate Disruption, as some pillock tried to christen it, was never going to catch on because, well, it's just too blatantly contrived and desperate isn't it?

So Global Weirding it is. The concept was popularised last week in acharacteristically dire and parti pris BBC Horizon documentary which purported to have lots of new evidence (or 'hearsay' as it would more likely have been termed in a court of law) showing that our weather is getting more extreme – weirder. It seems to have been broadcast to coincide with a new IPCC report which has been excitedly written up in newspapers like the Guardian and the Detroit Free Press as evidence that we are heading towards climate disaster.

Global warming is leading to such severe storms, droughts and heatwaves that nations should prepare for an unprecedented onslaught of deadly and costly weather disasters, an international panel of scientists has said.

The greatest danger is in highly populated, poorer regions, but no corner of the globe is immune. The document, by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, forecasts stronger tropical cyclones and more frequent heatwaves, deluges and droughts, and blames man-made climate change, population shifts and poverty.

But this is pretty much the exact opposite of what the IPCC report actually says. As Roger Pielke Jr has noted, the report is a far cry from the IPCC's usual slipshod, scaremongering standards:

Kudos to the IPCC — they have gotten the issue just about right, where "right" means that the report accurately reflects the academic literature on this topic. Over time good science will win out over the rest — sometimes it just takes a little while.

A few quotable quotes from the report (from Chapter 4):

• "There is medium evidence and high agreement that long-term trends in normalized losses have not been attributed to natural or anthropogenic climate change"
• "The statement about the absence of trends in impacts attributable to natural or anthropogenic climate change holds for tropical and extratropical storms and tornados"
• "The absence of an attributable climate change signal in losses also holds for flood losses"

The report even takes care of tying up a loose end that has allowed some commentators to avoid the scientific literature:

"Some authors suggest that a (natural or anthropogenic) climate change signal can be found in the records of disaster losses (e.g., Mills, 2005; Höppe and Grimm, 2009), but their work is in the nature of reviews and commentary rather than empirical research."

So what this IPCC report is saying is that WE DO NOT KNOW if there's an anthropogenic signal in extreme weather patterns, and that there does not seem to be a trend towards increased extreme weather events such as tornados and tropical storms. Yet the liberal MSM is reporting the opposite. How come?

Well here's the weird part. The misinformation comes from the IPCC's summary of its own report (available here) which has been regurgitated, in classic churnalism style, by all the usual lazy MSM suspects. (H/TKatabasis)

It begins:

"Evidence suggests that climate change has led to changes in climate extremes such as heat waves, record high temperatures and, in many regions, heavy precipitation in the past half century, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said today."

The IPCC, of course, has form in this regard. With its four Assessment Reports, its Summaries for Policymakers have been notably more extreme and confident in CAGW than the reports themselves warrant. So yet again what we have here is the work of serious-minded, neutral scientists (yes, they do still exist) being twisted for political purposes by activists.

As we know, the great global warming alarmism Ponzi scheme is looking extremely vulnerable at the moment. Global warming has stopped. There's a growing public backlash against eco-taxes, ugly flickery lightbulbs, higher energy bills, bat chomping eco-crucifixes and all the other paraphernalia of the environmental religion. And unfortunately, as we saw in '44 and '45, what these kind of people do when they get backed into a corner is not surrender but get nastier and more devious.

We've seen this recently in the Fakegate affair. And in Leo Hickman of the Guardian's contemptible "expose" of one of the hitherto anonymous donors of the Global Warming Policy Foundation. And in the Planet Under Pressure comedy conference staged last week by comedy organisations including the Royal Society, mainly in order to try to breathe new life into the stagnant, green-tinged corpse of climate alarmism.

One of the speakers at Planet Under Pressure claimed – in apparent seriousness – that climate scepticism was an illness that needed to be treated.

Scepticism regarding the need for immediate and massive action against carbon emissions is a sickness of societies and individuals which needs to be "treated", according to an Oregon-based professor of "sociology and environmental studies". Professor Kari Norgaard compares the struggle against climate scepticism to that against racism and slavery in the US South.

Prof Norgaard holds a B.S. in biology and a master's and PhD in sociology.

 "Over the past ten years I have published and taught in the areas of environmental sociology, gender and environment, race and environment, climate change, sociology of culture, social movements and sociology of emotions," she says.

As Paul Joseph Watson notes at Prison Planet:

The effort to re-brand legitimate scientific dissent as a mental disorder that requires pharmacological or psychological treatment is a frightening glimpse into the Brave New World society climate change alarmists see themselves as ruling over.

Due to the fact that skepticism towards man-made global warming is running at an all time high, and with good reason, rather than admit they have lost the debate, climate change alarmists are instead advocating that their ideological opponents simply be drugged or brainwashed into compliance.

By James Delingpole

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100148381/global-weirding-the-new-big-lie/

Shocking Revelation about Chemtrails as $4 Trillion 'Solar Umbrella'?

Ex-Satanist Discusses 'Major Deception' of the Last Days

‘Major deception of the last days… the (Satanic) priest told us … Master’s (Satan) Grand Plan for harvesting the nations/multitudes of the earth into his cause … Just before the close of the great controversy of the forces of good and evil … It is going to be done in a unique manner … people are going to eat this stuff … Spirits (demon spirits) will declare themselves to be inhabitants of far distant planets in the galaxies … coming to warn inhabitants of planet earth of the impending destruction of the planet … unless something is done to avoid it…’ Roger Morneau, Ex Satanist (0.18 – 1.27 above video)


Roger Morneau, the speaker, was involved in demon worship, lived in that world for many months, and escaped alive. He is able to give us inside information about it. It does not conform with popular notes of who parttakes and what the activities are. Roger was elected to be a member of an elite group of demon worshipers. When he was about to be permanently initiated he asked for help from higher powers to leave it alive. Interview with the famous author of the book titled "A Trip into the Supernatural"

http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2011/01/11/earth-must-prepare-for-close-encounter-with-aliens-say-scientists/

Playing God in every sense... Altering Genes & Altering the Atmosphere

'Levitating Nanoparticles may make for better Geoengineering'.....

A recent analysis of geoengineering options indicated that, while pumping chemicals into the upper atmosphere would work, the approach comes with significant risks. Since the chemicals would gradually come back out of the atmosphere, these schemes would require constant input to remain effective. A paper released in PNAS this week suggests there might be a lower-effort alternative: nanoparticles that are structured in a way that helps them control their altitude.

Even if CO2 emissions are eventually reduced, we may have put enough in the atmosphere by then to ensure that some form of geoengineering may be needed to lower the global temperature. Aerosols in the upper atmosphere increase the Earth’s albedo (the overall reflectivity of the planet), reducing global temperatures by reflecting more sunlight back into space. Chemical aerosols are popular geoengineering candidates, but they have their own problems; for example, sulfates in the lower stratosphere can accelerate removal of ozone, and we’d have to constantly pump more into the upper atmosphere.

The main advantage of the proposed nano-structures over chemical areosols is their ability to control their altitude. The proposed nano-structures do this by taking advantage of what are called photophoretic forces. Photophoretic forces arise from a temperature difference between the nano-structure and the surrounding atmosphere. If a cold gas particle strikes a warmer nano-structure, then the gas particle will recoil off with more energy. That results in a force on the particle. The amount of energy transferred in this process is a property of the material and a function of the temperature, and is described by something called the accommodation coefficient (α). By constructing nanostructures with different values of α, one can change the net force on the nanostructure.

The authors propose constructing a disk five microns in diameter and 50 nanometers thick. The disk is primarily made up of two layers, metallic aluminum and barium titanate. The aluminum layer reflects sunlight, but is transparent to thermal infrared. The barium titanate layer has a higher density than the aluminum layer and interacts with the atmosphere’s electric field to orient the disk with the reflective side up. The difference in α between aluminum and barium titanate also produces a net photophoretic force, levitating the disk with a force up to three times its weight.

In their simulations, the authors were able to show that their devices would tend to settle at two altitudes: 40 kilometers (just below the stratospause) or 100 kilometers (in the mesopause) Both locations would avoid possible ozone interactions in the lower stratosphere.

The authors also found that the addition of a 0.5 micron magnetite particle would enable interactions with the earth’s magnetic field, causing the particles to drift towards the poles. The ability to concentrate reflective materials at high latitudes may help lessen the impact of the loss of polar ice. The loss of ice lowers the albedo at the poles, increasing the temperature and melting more ice. These nanoparticles might provide a means to short-circuit this feedback.

By Christopher Dombrowski

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/09/levitating-nanoparticles-may-make-for-better-geoengineering.ars

Excerpt from documentary explaining why it 'Rains Fish'

An excerpt from the first episode of the award winning 1999 BBC documentary series Supernatural on 'Raining Fish'.....

Media's stance on Global Warming changes as often as the Weather...

Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)

• Met Office releases new figures which show no warming in 15 years

The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years.

The figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century.

Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.

A painting, dated 1684, by Abraham Hondius depicts one of many frost fairs on the River Thames during the mini ice age

Meanwhile, leading climate scientists yesterday told The Mail on Sunday that, after emitting unusually high levels of energy throughout the 20th Century, the sun is now heading towards a ‘grand minimum’ in its output, threatening cold summers, bitter winters and a shortening of the season available for growing food.

Solar output goes through 11-year cycles, with high numbers of sunspots seen at their peak.

We are now at what should be the peak of what scientists call ‘Cycle 24’ – which is why last week’s solar storm resulted in sightings of the aurora borealis further south than usual. But sunspot numbers are running at less than half those seen during cycle peaks in the 20th Century.

Analysis by experts at NASA and the University of Arizona – derived from magnetic-field measurements 120,000 miles beneath the sun’s surface – suggest that Cycle 25, whose peak is due in 2022, will be a great deal weaker still. 

According to a paper issued last week by the Met Office, there is a  92 per cent chance that both Cycle 25 and those taking place in the following decades will be as weak as, or weaker than, the ‘Dalton minimum’ of 1790 to 1830. In this period, named after the meteorologist John Dalton, average temperatures in parts of Europe fell by 2C.

However, it is also possible that the new solar energy slump could be as deep as the ‘Maunder minimum’ (after astronomer Edward Maunder), between 1645 and 1715 in the coldest part of the ‘Little Ice Age’ when, as well as the Thames frost fairs, the canals of Holland froze solid.

Yet, in its paper, the Met Office claimed that the consequences now would be negligible – because the impact of the sun on climate is far less than man-made carbon dioxide. Although the sun’s output is likely to decrease until 2100, ‘This would only cause a reduction in global temperatures of 0.08C.’ Peter Stott, one of the authors, said: ‘Our findings suggest  a reduction of solar activity to levels not seen in hundreds of years would be insufficient to offset the dominant influence of greenhouse gases.’

These findings are fiercely disputed by other solar experts.

‘World temperatures may end up a lot cooler than now for 50 years or more,’ said Henrik Svensmark, director of the Center for Sun-Climate Research at Denmark’s National Space Institute. ‘It will take a long battle to convince some climate scientists that the sun is important. It may well be that the sun is going to demonstrate this on its own, without the need for their help.’

He pointed out that, in claiming the effect of the solar minimum would be small, the Met Office was relying on the same computer models that are being undermined by the current pause in global-warming.

CO2 levels have continued to rise without interruption and, in 2007, the Met Office claimed that global warming was about to ‘come roaring back’. It said that between 2004 and 2014 there would be an overall increase of 0.3C. In 2009, it predicted that at least three of the years 2009 to 2014 would break the previous temperature record set in 1998.

So far there is no sign of any of this happening. But yesterday a Met Office spokesman insisted its models were still valid.

‘The ten-year projection remains groundbreaking science. The period for the original projection is not over yet,’ he said.

Dr Nicola Scafetta, of Duke University in North Carolina, is the author of several papers that argue the Met Office climate models show there should have been ‘steady warming from 2000 until now’.

‘If temperatures continue to stay flat or start to cool again, the divergence between the models and recorded data will eventually become so great that the whole scientific community will question the current theories,’ he said.

He believes that as the Met Office model attaches much greater significance to CO2 than to the sun, it was bound to conclude that there would not be cooling. ‘The real issue is whether the model itself is accurate,’ Dr Scafetta said. Meanwhile, one of America’s most eminent climate experts, Professor Judith Curry of the  Georgia Institute of Technology, said she found the Met Office’s confident prediction of a ‘negligible’ impact difficult to understand.

‘The responsible thing to do would be to accept the fact that the models may have severe shortcomings when it comes to the influence of the sun,’ said Professor Curry. As for the warming pause, she said that many scientists ‘are not surprised’.

She argued it is becoming evident that factors other than CO2 play an important role in rising or falling warmth, such as the 60-year water temperature cycles in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans.

‘They have insufficiently been appreciated in terms of global climate,’ said Prof Curry. When both oceans were cold in the past, such as from 1940 to 1970, the climate cooled. The Pacific cycle ‘flipped’ back from warm to cold mode in 2008 and the Atlantic is also thought likely to flip in the next few years .

Pal Brekke, senior adviser at the Norwegian Space Centre, said some scientists found the importance of water cycles difficult to accept, because doing so means admitting that the oceans – not CO2 – caused much of the global warming between 1970 and 1997.

The same goes for the impact of the sun – which was highly active for much of the 20th Century.

‘Nature is about to carry out a very interesting experiment,’ he said. ‘Ten or 15 years from now, we will be able to determine much better whether the warming of the late 20th Century really was caused by man-made CO2, or by natural variability.’

Meanwhile, since the end of last year, world temperatures have fallen by more than half a degree, as the cold ‘La Nina’ effect has re-emerged in the South Pacific.

‘We’re now well into the second decade of the pause,’ said Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation. ‘If we don’t see convincing evidence of global warming by 2015, it will start to become clear whether the models are bunk. And, if they are, the implications for some scientists could be very serious.’

By DAVID ROSE

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2093264/Forget-global-warming--Cycle-25-need-worry-NASA-scientists-right-Thames-freezing-again.html#ixzz1l529nqt3

The '2012' Phenomena...

Ok, so I thought I'd write about the '2012 Doomsday Phenomenon’ that seems to be making the news on a daily basis (with the mainstream media as the prime suspects...). You might be surprised how many ‘serious’ people are actually seriously worried about the discussions taking place, or simply the jargon they've been fed by the mass media has done its job! And in case you are not aware what the 2012 phenomena is all about, it is the 'End of Days' or 'Armageddon' scenario. Most of it is either absolute rubbish, has been wildly distorted, or (on the rare occasion) actually is worthy of a genuine basis for acknowledgement (or concern, if you wish...)

So here goes.

I`m going to do my best to explain to you what 'I' know through my individual research, and what my own personal opinion is about the phenomena... (not that you may want or need my take on it...). But, if for some reason you would like to hear what I have to say about it all, then here it is... and I hasten to add I am no expert on the subject. I have simply been asked my opinion too many times that I've decided to kill all birds with one stone, and having found myself with a small window of time... decided to write it down.

Firstly, I'm going to run through all the facts, theories (and downright outrageous stories…) that you may or may not have heard about. And, in case you didn't know the exact date this is all supposed to happen... it’s the 21 December, wait for it, yes you've guessed right! 2012... :)

Here it is, in a nutshell, in no specific order of relevance:-

• Mayan Calender Prophecy - And bear in mind there are massive disagreements on this between archaeologists, historians, mystics and other scientific 'experts'. But the essential gist of it all is that on the 21 December, the 5,125 year-old Mesoamerican calender runs out... That's basically it. The Mayans were supposedly known for their extraordinary astronomical observations and mathematical prowess, so they must have had a valid reason right, is what everyone seems to be worried about. The question is, are the archaeological and historic interpretations accurate? And if so, what does it mean when the calender ends? Does a new one simply begin? Does it mean global Armageddon? Or maybe perhaps it means a global shift/transformation (physically or spiritually) in human attitudes towards a higher level of enlightenment? Those are some of the thoughts currently being discussed…

• Petrus Romanus (The Prophecy of the Popes) - This is an 800 year old prophecy by Saint Malachy, a 12th Century bishop, 'accurately' describing each of the Popes up until today... when, after Pope Benedict, we will witness the Last Pope... ‘Peter the Roman’... whose arrival will result in the destruction of Rome, signalling the coming of the False Prophet and the Antichrist. So not all that great really...

• The 'Year of the Dragon' - I don't need to go into too much detail here but essentially what some Christian 'end-timers' believe to represent the 'Year of the Beast'. To some the dragon is symbolic of being the luckiest year in the Chinese Zodiac calender. To others it represents the unluckiest... the signal of the arrival of the Beast/the Antichrist, as to them, the dragon historically isn't the nicest of creatures and represents something a little different shall we say…

• The Economic Debt Crisis - This again hopefully doesn't need too much explanation as I'm quite sure you've all heard a fair amount about it! What it means, or what it leads to, would be what happened last in 1929, following the last major market collapse, and followed 8 years later by the German invasion of Poland triggering World War II... experts suggest that historically after a prolonged global downturn, profound political and global repercussions take place, usually culminating in war, and in this case...

• World War III - This would be the final solution to what we are witnessing taking place as I speak. A supposed nuclear Iran (possibly backed by Russia and China fed up with America's self-appointed 'World Police' tag...) vs. the U.S, U.K, Israel... I think you get the general picture we all know to exist... and this would tellingly result in 'Nuclear Armageddon'. This also ties in to our next topic...

• Islamic ‘End Times’ Theology - Some, particularly within the US and Israeli governments, are aware of, or perhaps have convinced themselves, that the supreme Ayatollah, the President and the entire Iranian Shia-regime, believe that Islamic eschatology (end-times theology) points to the coming of the Messiah known as the 12th Imam Mahdi, and are in fact accelerating attacks based on this motive in the belief that he will appear to establish a global Islamic kingdom known as the caliphate. In order to do this, according to Israel, they will annihilate the state of Israel (or 'Little Satan', as it affectionately known to them...) and the U.S ('Big Satan'... trying my best not to laugh here...)

• The ‘Arab Spring’ & ‘Occupy Movements’ – These revolutionary movements, currently being witnessed, would be intrinsically linked to the economic debt crisis and could be viewed as one-and-the-same I suppose. They could equally be linked to an eventual Islamic Republic vs. ‘The West’ World-War, arising from the increasing levels of deprivation being experienced on both sides, and culminating in the inevitable when pushed so far...

• A Geomagnetic Reversal – Often referred to as a Polar Shift. This theory is based on debatable scientific evidence that the Earth’s magnetic field is weakening which would lead to a reversal of the poles. There are a number of theories as to why this might be occurring, with the most valid being the Sun reaching its Solar Maximum in 2012, though some experts say 2013, releasing solar storms (and rather large flares…) that would have dire consequences on the planet to say the least (see the movie 2012 for visual reference… or was that more global warming from what I can remember?… sorry, couldn’t help myself). Other theories would have this geomagnetic reversal connected to galactic alignments and astronomical events, to which we will come to later on…

• The ‘Super Volcano’ – There are also a number of possible candidates for this one, I’m sorry to say… Yellowstone National Park in the U.S is perhaps the most well-known. But there are, disturbingly, quite a few more… Lake Toba in Indonesia; Lake Taupo in New Zealand; the Aira Caldera in Japan; and the list goes on including the more recent possible ‘find’ of Laacher See Lake in Germany… The point is, an eruption from one of these ‘Super-Volcano's’ would prove cataclysmic. Some of the immediate and long-term effects would be the mass extinctions of species (humans included), changes to weather (extreme… with the possibility of plunging humanity into another ice-age) and the knock-on effects, e.g. land/food/water (uninhabitable/severely diminished/undrinkable)… Oh, and did I mention that Yellowstone in particular last erupted 640,000 years ago, so, depending on differing estimates, is long overdue an eruption by a few 100 to a 1000 years… But, to put your mind at rest, we could also be waiting a thousand more…

• Global Warming – Literally just watch the movie if you believe this one… I don’t buy it I’m afraid :) …This theory is based around the destruction of our planet caused by ‘us’. Now whilst I don’t deny humanity could be doing considerably more to reduce CO2 emissions etc. etc. etc., I don’t believe it would have such a detrimental effect on the planets ability to survive. If we are experiencing global changes in climate, weather patterns etc., for me, this is due more to geomagnetic reversals, solar flares (solar maximums), and simply where scientific data tells us that historically the Earth goes through cyclical periods where it experiences numerous Glacial and Inter-glacial cycles resulting in correlating levels of carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere, as a direct result. So, we would in affect, be somewhere closer on the graph to coming-out-of-an-ice-age…

• Galactic Astronomical Alignments – The science here is focused on the ‘12 Zodiac Constellations’, the ecliptic path taken by the Sun and our view of this event from the Earth. When the Sun reaches its Solstice position (December 21…) it will appear, from Earth, to come into alignment with the Milky Way, that Galaxy that contains our Solar System… For people that place a great deal of significance and mysticism to astrology (esoteric new-agers…), this means that the Sun’s equinox is leaving the Pisces constellation and entering into the Aquarius. Hence the beginning of a ‘New-Age’, the ‘Age of Aquarius’, and the ending of another astrological age... This event would be viewed by some as to herald a new dawn, a new event, of universal importance and of obvious consequence to our planet. Whether such an event would be catastrophic or enlightening would depend on your interpretations and beliefs in any-which-way. I suppose from a Christian perspective (or any religion for that matter), one who studies astrology and ‘signs in the sky’ might interpret such an event as heralding the arrival of, lets say, perhaps the Second coming of the Messiah or an event of extreme significant religious importance. I think you get where I’m going with this theory… Such an astronomical event would hold substantial sway from whichever perspective it was viewed from… However, I would like to add that astronomical events occur all the time in various sizes and with varying impacts on the Earth itself, if any… But sure this one would be a biggy…

• UFO Disclosure – No, I kid you not, this is a real and serious concern for an alarming number of people worldwide (I would say well into the millions…), and is growing momentum by the day. There are varying versions of what might happen and I will do my best to skip through it quickly... Some believe that we will be invaded by genuine ET’s with either apocalyptic consequences, or what will be the beginning of a great new friendship, depending on how you view ‘them’. Others believe that it is all a big hoax by the government (see New World Order...), where they have either been the little-green-men all along (hiding there advanced technology…), or they have in fact secretly been in league with the little blighters from the beginning, or similarly, they will put on a ‘great show’ using the HAARP project blue-beam to orchestrate such an event (Fake Alien invasion/Return of the Messiah...) that we might all come together as one big, scared, happy family desperate to unite under their convenient ‘One-World Government’ dictatorship… There is also a rather disconcerting and increasing number of Christians (some call them End-Timers or Rapturites), who believe that the UFO’s could in fact be physical manifestations of either spiritual beings (and here I’m referring to Angels and Demons…) or, the Nephilim (Giants/Sons of God), who existed in the days of Noah before God saw their wickedness and destroyed them (See Genesis 6:4, King James Bible… also mentioned again in Numbers 13:33). There were also a number of scholars and scientists at an ‘Alien Abduction Conference’ held at MIT in 1992, who presented research that provided an unnerving amount of parallels between the ‘abduction experience’ and satanic ritual abuse (thanks is due here to Dr. Michael Heiser…)

• Rogue Planet or Comet – This is fairly self-explanatory… Believers speculate that a comet (usually Elenin…) or rogue planet (usually Nibiru…) will collide with the Earth and we will quite simply cease to exist (check out the movie Armageddon for artistic impression on this one)… :)

• Strange Mass Animal Deaths – There are a number of theories about these mass animal deaths that have just recently been witnessed. The events most commonly experienced are usually either thousands of birds falling from the sky, or occasionally, fish washing ashore in the hundreds if not thousands… Whilst an abnormal number of people take this as a sign of an apocalyptic year to come, there may perhaps be other various explanations… One of the theories is that these events are ‘proof’ of the on-going use of ‘Weaponized-Weather Weapons’, such as HAARP, that unfortunately has catastrophic consequences for our winged friends. Another theory similarly to this one would be the use of Chemtrails sprayed into the atmosphere, further proof of the poisonous chemicals being used, and for reasons without explanation (see agenda 21 or ‘fixing the whole’ in the ozone layer… depending on your stance). Other theories attributed to the events range from fireworks causing disorientation and ‘death by fright’; Hail storms; Lightning Strikes; Other freak weather phenomena; and my personal favourite… Geomagnetic Reversal… which is probably the most logical…

• Christian ‘End-Times’ Theology – Now this theory would combine all of these preceding theories and take them into account as being ‘biblical signs’ as mentioned in the Bible… such as the Books of Revelation and Mark… Mark 13:7 clearly says, “And when ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars, be ye not troubled: for such things must needs be; but the end shall not be yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these are the beginnings of sorrows”… Now the Book of Matthew 24: 36 also says, “But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be”. Whilst we may be witnessing events worthy of such description as mentioned in the Bible, I would also point out that such events have been witnessed throughout history and, to a large extent, far worse than we are experiencing now… Economic-debt-crisis, world-wars (of which I have personally not yet witnessed, just to put it into perspective…), revolutions, ice-ages/global warming, catastrophic volcanic eruptions, other astronomical alignments, mass animal deaths etc… These have been occurring since human civilization began and will continue to do so. Yes, if we add to that a number of supposedly significant prophecies (Petrus Romanus and the Mayan Calender...) then the signs are perhaps heightened somewhat, but then again, there have been numerous unfulfilled prophecies before now, so why should these be any different? I would also add to this line of thinking another reference to Mark 13:6 “For many shall come in my name, saying I am Christ; and shall deceive many”…. As far as I can remember we have not, yet, witnessed anyone claiming (seriously I might add, not any old nutcase from the psychiatric ward…) to be the Son of God, the returning Messiah. Sure we have had numerous false prophets, and will continue to do so, but a serious claim from (let’s say) a person to be taken a bit more seriously, such as the 'Buddha-Boy' for example… would warrant a more valid reference to us truly witnessing bible prophecy when concerning the end of days.

To conclude, and I think you can probably guess by now, what my opinion is on the whole 2012 'craze'… I would say that it is certainly a year where we will possibly be experiencing more events related to such talk, coincidence or not, natural or unnatural (see orchestrated chaos…). However, there have also been I’m sure, as many similar coincidences occuring throughout our human history... I’m fairly certain had I have had the misfortune of being involved in a world-war, where every nation was pretty much involved whether they liked it or not, or perhaps in a major revolution (such as the French for example…), or even if I had been born perhaps into a native tribe in the America’s 'pre-colonization', before the coming of the ‘alien’ white race, only to be pushed towards almost total annihilation… then I would have certainly been far more convinced that I may have been experiencing the 'end of the world' as I would have known it.

So, YES something 'significant' is highly likely to happen in 2012, based on the scientific evidence alone, and quite possibly on the 21 December, if that’s what research tells us... But whether or not such an event would simply be a great sight to witness (such as a once in a lifetime galactic alignment…), or whether it would prove to be catastrophic, either way I would not worry yourselves about it… If such a freak event were to occur (let’s say a super-volcano or comet for dramatic purposes, as I’m sure you must be nodding off now…), it could happen at any time, any day, of any month, in any year. To put it simply we should be living our lives accordingly as if each day were our last, regardless of whether tomorrow may be, because let’s face it, it could happen anytime (1 Thessalonians 5:2-11, "For you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night”.)... 

It will do you no good trying to predict the future... as the bible clearly says (for the Christians out there)… “Of that day and hour knoweth no man”… so, I would suggest, live your lives as best as you can, live each day as if it were your last, and love one another…..

GOD BLESS YOU

By Hidden Truth News

Scientists a step closer to steering hurricanes

How to halt a hurricane: Click to enlarge 

By Tim Shipman in Washington

12:01AM BST 21 Oct 2007

Scientists have made a breakthrough in man's desire to control the forces of nature – unveiling plans to weaken hurricanes and steer them off course, to prevent tragedies such as Hurricane Katrina.

• Is the US heading for an environmental 9/11?
• James Lovelock's plan to pump ocean water to stop climate change

The damage done to New Orleans in 2005 has spurred two rival teams of climate experts, in America and Israel, to redouble their efforts to enable people to play God with the weather.

Under one scheme, aircraft would drop soot into the near-freezing cloud at the top of a hurricane, causing it to warm up and so reduce wind speeds. Computer simulations of the forces at work in the most violent storms have shown that even small changes can affect their paths – enabling them to be diverted from major cities.

But the hurricane modifiers are fighting more than the weather. Lawyers warn that diverting a hurricane from one city to save life and property could result in multi-billion dollar lawsuits from towns that bear the brunt instead. Hurricane Katrina caused about $41 billion in damage to New Orleans.

Hurricanes form when air warmed over the ocean rises to meet the cool upper atmosphere. The heat turns to kinetic energy, producing a spiral of wind and rain. The greater the temperature differences between top and bottom, and the narrower the eye of the hurricane, the faster it blows.

RELATED ARTICLES

• Flying into the eye of the storm 
  02 Mar 2007

Moshe Alamaro, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), told The Sunday Telegraph of his plans to "paint" the tops of hurricanes black by scattering carbon particles – either soot or black particles from the manufacture of tyres – from aircraft flying above the storms. The particles would absorb heat from the sun, leading to changes in the airflows within the storm. Satellites could also heat the cloud tops by beaming microwaves from space.

"If they're done in the right place at the right time they can affect the strength of the hurricane," Mr Alamaro said.

The theory has so far been tested only in computer simulation by Mr Alamaro's colleague, Ross Hoffman. Mr Alamaro said: "With small changes to this side or that side of the hurricane we can nudge it and change its track. We're starting with computer simulations, then will hopefully experiment on a small weather system."

Last month scientists at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem announced that they had simulated the effect of sowing clouds with microscopic dust to cool the hurricane's base, also weakening it. The dust would attract water but would form droplets too small to fall as rain. Instead, they would rise and evaporate, cooling hot air at the hurricane base.

• Space diving to be next extreme sport
• Acidic oceans threaten marine life
• 1987 Great Storm: Terrible blow, not a knockout

In findings presented at a conference in Trieste, Italy, the team led by Daniel Rosenfeld demonstrated that dust dropped into the lower part of Hurricane Katrina would have reduced wind speeds and diverted its course.

The MIT team has now hired a professor of risk management to advise on steps necessary to protect themselves from legal action by communities affected if a hurricane is diverted. It is pressing for changes to US law and for an international treaty to settle possible disputes between neighbouring countries.

Mr Alamaro said: "The social and legal issues are daunting. If a hurricane were coming towards Miami with the potential to cause damage and kill people, and we diverted it, another town or village hit by it would sue us. They'll say the hurricane is no longer an act of God, but that we caused it."

• Share:    

inShare0

World News

• News »

IN WORLD NEWS

 

How should I vote in the Republican Primaries?